Jump to content » Sign-in | » Register
HP.com Home Products and Services Support and Drivers Solutions How to Buy
» Contact HP

 

Forums advanced search
HP.com Home
Business Support Forums > Servers > ProLiant servers - Netservers

LH3 Performance

» 

Business Support Center

HP Passport Sign-in

User ID:
Password:
»Register
»Learn more...

Tasks

» Download drivers and software
» Troubleshoot a problem
» Setup, install, and configure
» Discover and use a product
» Perform regular maintenance
» Upgrade and migrate
» Recycle and dispose
»

Resources

» Diagnose problem (HP Instant Support)
» Support Forums
» Manuals
» Sign up: driver and support alerts
» Parts information
» Warranty information
» Help
» Sitemap
» IT professionals

Member icons
 
 HP moderator  HP moderator
  Expert in this area  Expert in this area
Member status
Shining Shining
150 points
Bright Bright
300 points
Radiant Radiant
750 points
Brilliant Brilliant
1500 points
Beaming Beaming
2,500 points
Hot Hot
7,500 points
Sweltering Sweltering
20,000 points
»  How to earn points
»  Support forums FAQs
Question status
Magical answer Magical answer
Message with a response that solved the author's question
Favorites status
Add to my favorites Add to my favorites
Delete from my favorites Delete from my favorites
This thread has been closed Thread closed
 

Content starts here
   Create a new message    Receive e-mail notification if a new reply is posted  Reply to this message
Author Subject: LH3 Performance      Add to my favorites
Jon Watry
Jan 30, 2002 07:37:38 GMT   

Maybe i'm just expecting to much but my LH3's seem slow when copying data to them. One night I copied the same file to an LH3 and a PC and the PC was faster. What kind of tranfer rate shoould I get with the following setups. Also what is a good program to test the transfer rates on the hard drives so I can get some actual numbers. I tried HP's PAT and the transfer rate on the Sequential test was 12.22Mb/sec

Server 1
6x9gig 7200Rpm:(
Raid 5 using all 6 drives

server 2 is same but 18gig drives
Note: If you are the author of this question and wish to assign points to any of the answers, please login first.For more information on assigning points ,click here


Sort Answers By: Date or Points
Jon Watry
Jan 30, 2002 07:46:45 GMT    N/A: Question Author

Also is is possible to upgrade the cache on the RAID controller?
Marco Hogeveen Expert in this area This member has accumulated 300 or more points
Jan 30, 2002 08:10:03 GMT  10 pts

Jon,

An LH3 with 6 harddisks in RAID5 should be pretty fast.
Some things that can slow down the server are:
-stripsize on the RAID5 set: small stripesize (4k) gets worse performance than a large stripesize (64k)
- Transfer Speed on SCSI-channel: Boot to Ctrl-M (Express Tools) and check: Objects->Scsi Channel-> SCSI Transfer Rate=Ultra2.
If it's FAST (20MB/sec) or Ultra (40MB/sec) you should set it to Ultra2 (80MB/sec).
Only do this when your harddisks are also Ultra2 compatible.
If you're not sure about this, just let me know the productnumber of the disks...

Also check Objects->Logical Drive-> Properties the Write Policy, Read Policy and Cache Policy of the logical drive.
You can also see the Stripesize of the logical drive here.

The Netraid Cache is upgradable to 64MB max (p/n: D7132A).

Marco.
Jon Watry
Jan 30, 2002 09:21:36 GMT    N/A: Question Author

I just checked my BDC(the 9gig array) and found out the transfer rate was set to FAST and I changed it to ultra-2. I ran HP's PAT again and the same test came out to 23.73Mb/sec this time.

below are the setting on the Logical Drive

Raid = 5
Size = 43385MB
StripeSize = 64KB
Write Policy = WRTHRU
Read Policy = ADAPTIVE
Cace Policy = CachedIO
Virtual Sizing = DISABLED
#Sripes = 6
Sate = OPTIMAL

Do you think the 64MB Cache upgrade would be worth it?
James Wood
Feb 2, 2002 00:35:41 GMT  7 pts

What is the purpose of this machine?
If there is a LOT of disk I/O from multiple sources, then it can help. If there is not, or the bulk of the I/O goes to a single source, then the increased cache is unlikely to impact performance.

The best impact you can do is the raid level.

RAID 5 is a good balance between read/write.

RAID 0 is great read/write I/O but no redundancy

RAID 3 is great read, worse write access.

A RAID 50 would improve read access without degrading write access.

A RAID 30 would improve read access wile further degrading write access.

You might backup your data, and try a few RAID configs with testing for the best balance for your needs.
Jon Watry
Feb 6, 2002 11:33:23 GMT    N/A: Question Author

One is my PDC which does DHCP, WINS, Print and has the home directorys for 2500 students and also contains about 2gigs of data that the differnt departments in the school share.

My BDC is home to more than 100 applications but the most used ones are the databases for the library and Eureka a carrer finder program and Microtype multimedia which is 200MB and almost 100MB of it is avi's. This server also contains about 8GB in the 200 staff directorys.

Both servers have 2gig fat partitions and the rest of the Raid is a single NTFS partition.

Also sometime this year we will be moving the attendance database over to one of these servers. Each school database is about 15-60MB and there are about 40 very active users with another 20 light users. Also with this move we will start using a web based version the softeware and it has the potential to be used by the whole school which is around 200users. I plan on putting this software on the BDC but should I put it on the PDC?

Also if there is anything at all that you would change on the servers above let me know. you will not ofend me since a company set the servers up about 2years before I took over this job.

Also do you defrag a RAID array?

Thanks
Torben Hoeiby
Mar 1, 2002 07:05:23 GMT  7 pts

The fastest is when the blocking size on the volume (default 4k) you specify when formatting the volume, matches the stripe size of the netraid controller. I know - you might loose some capacity on that vol if you have many small files. But there is no such thing ad a free lunch.

Furthermore you cache policy could be set to write back. That would speed up writing. But be aware that the LH3 does not have battery backup on the netraid controller cache so data corruption is a potential risc in case of a powerfailure on a system without UPS. (this only applies to onboard and netraid 1 ctrls)
Jon Watry
Mar 6, 2002 16:24:27 GMT    N/A: Question Author

Torben thanks for the info.

I plan on adding more disks to the BDC later this year and I will try a larger stripe size. This evening I will also change the setting on the raid controller.
 
Create a new message    Receive e-mail notification if a new reply is posted   Reply to this message
 
 
Printable version
Privacy statement Using this site means you accept its terms Feedback to webmaster
© 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.